 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Banned
 Member 26900 Level 3.93 Dec 2007 
|
Ron Paul and state powers
I've been doing a little research on Ron Paul, and he seems like a great candidate.
He's a strong libertarianist, who sticks by the constitution and thinks objectively. The only thing I'm not sure if I agree with is his idea on state law. He wants to give a lot of power to the states. Couldn't that be bad? Could the states grow apart, or change so much that their needs and interests might be completely different? Maybe even in the future leading to a civil war, or a country of 50 very different states, making them incomparable. I mean, if the states had the power, that means they can be so different. Like different countries even. I don't know much about politics, and I'm not here to flame or anything, I just want some experienced advice. Thank you Jam it back in, in the dark. |
|
Banned
Member 26900 Level 3.93 Dec 2007
|
I don't really understand. I'm sorry. the first amendment is freedom of speech (and basically individuality), but what is the free association clause?
There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Fenix