 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 267 Level 49.52 Mar 2006 
|
Pacman is more violent than The Legend of Zelda
At least according to a new study presented before Congress today. Apparently the percentage was calculated by looking at the duration of time a player spends doing violent acts against other characters during a 90 minute play session.
The article mentions this, but this is seriously fucking flawed. This is not a valid indicator of how violent a game is at all. You can play GTA for 90 minutes and not kill or shoot anything; does this make it an E-rated game? Are they trying to suggest games where a little pizza shaped yellow thing is more violent and more of a bad influence than an underage kid wielding weapons against wolves and other huge monsters? This is why I hate these people that are determined to get video games taken down a peg. They know they have nothing, yet they still try to hyperbole it up. Jam it back in, in the dark.  |
Member 267 Level 49.52 Mar 2006
|
Identity Crisis, how can we be entirely sure you're not Jack Thompson?
How ya doing, buddy? |
value tart