Products of Creation Science

I really fucking hate myself for playing Devil's Advocate, but could you possibly link to the paper that you reviewed and the one you had published RR, and give any details you remember about the peer review process for both?

Sigh... I should stay out of this shit but I just want this fucking thread to die already.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by RacinReaver

As magi said, I don't have anything to do with the evolution/ID debate in my professional work, but here's a link to some work I was part of a few years ago: ISIJ International I doubt it'll be interesting to anyone around here.

The paper I helped look at I can't link you to since it was rejected because it didn't get accepted. The research group I was part of got to review it since they used some of our data in the interpretation of our data, but they completely misinterpreted our research, and didn't actually add anything new to the scientific body of knowledge (actually would have made it worse by putting out bad info!).

I get that, but the reason I asked was less its relevance to the original topic and more along the lines of showing the peer review process in action to debunk the argument from LordSword concerning it.

There's nowhere I can't reach.