my theory

Originally Posted by Agrias

I'm an idiot? I'm far from an idiot. I have a 4.0 at my university, and teach MCAT classes (read: medical school admission test preparation classes).

My basis on calling you a fool was not one of insult, but of common sense, to better you as a person. Look at the world around you, it did not happen by accident. Nothing happens by accident, and even if it does, it's someone's accident. That is my basis for anti-atheism. Prove me wrong.

LOL. It's almost sad, how much of a jackass you are. Anyway, your theory on the impossibility of being an "accident" is pointless. Here's my rebuttal:

My basis on calling you a jackass was not one of insult, but of common sense, to stroke my ego better you as a person. Look at the world around you, it happened by probability. Whether there was a motivation (which is what theism implies) is unknown, but there was a cause and effect. Cause and effect does not imply motivation, no matter how you'd like to look at it. It's impossible to disprove athiesm by disproving accidents. Atheism doesn't center on accidental creation, it's centers on non-motivational creation. Accidental is simply a word you're putting in atheist's mouths to work for your benefit, and implies that it wasn't supposed to happen, which then implies there is a motivation at work.

It's hilarious that you think you have an airtight argument considering how paper-thin it was. Though I guess all that ego inflation doesn't help things.

Plus, you care about pro wrestling, which automatically makes you an idiot.

Jam it back in, in the dark.