She doesn't bother me very much. In a lot of those cases she so adamantly voices her stance, she is usually correct. She is a very outspoken, pro-prosecutor. I think her stance on victim's rights is at least a stance on something solid. There are just too many tentative prosecutors out there.
|
Originally Posted by kat
I just think for her that means assuming guilty before proven innocent.
|
That's technically what being a prosecutor means. Why would they bother to make a case unless they believed that person was guilty of a said crime?
It's the defendants lawyers that say, "Innocent until proven guilty"
Most amazing jew boots
85242
35212
Synthesis