 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 25457 Level 3.20 Oct 2007 
|
Odd, I thought he sounded like a blithering imbecile who spouts the same soundbite nonsense that is made to sound like some enlightening statement. Comparing the Bush Administration to Putin's Russia, what a moron. I'm not sure what was more disturbing, the fact that he said it, or that he may actually believe that. But hey, this totalitarian state is good enough for him to seek refuge, eh?
The guy is a glorified hack, IMO. And Chris Matthews, please. I wouldn't waste valuable time listening to that stupid chimp. Jam it back in, in the dark.
The alleged purpose of antitrust laws was to protect competition; that purpose was based on the socialistic fallacy that a free, unregulated market will inevitably lead to the establishment of coercive monopolies. But, in fact, no coercive monopoly has ever been or ever can be established by means of free trade on a free market. Every coercive monopoly was created by government intervention into the economy, by special privileges which closed the entry of competitors in a given field, by legislative action. ~Ayn Rand
|
Member 25457 Level 3.20 Oct 2007
|
Michael Dyson, Chris Matthews, Bill Maher, wow, we've got quite an idiot parade going on today.
There's nowhere I can't reach.
The alleged purpose of antitrust laws was to protect competition; that purpose was based on the socialistic fallacy that a free, unregulated market will inevitably lead to the establishment of coercive monopolies. But, in fact, no coercive monopoly has ever been or ever can be established by means of free trade on a free market. Every coercive monopoly was created by government intervention into the economy, by special privileges which closed the entry of competitors in a given field, by legislative action. ~Ayn Rand
|
Member 25457 Level 3.20 Oct 2007
|
I have a threshold as to what I can consider reasonable to even debate. A man who seeks refuge for his family in the U.S. who then compares its leaders to Putin's defacto-dictatorship, you see where I might have difficulty taking this man seriously? And Bill Maher, who's rightfully still embittered from Politically Incorrect getting axed, wastes his talent on lowbrow, glorified shock-jock commentary while making lucid points every so often. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
The alleged purpose of antitrust laws was to protect competition; that purpose was based on the socialistic fallacy that a free, unregulated market will inevitably lead to the establishment of coercive monopolies. But, in fact, no coercive monopoly has ever been or ever can be established by means of free trade on a free market. Every coercive monopoly was created by government intervention into the economy, by special privileges which closed the entry of competitors in a given field, by legislative action. ~Ayn Rand
Last edited by Zhuge Liang; Oct 20, 2007 at 01:43 PM.
|
Member 25457 Level 3.20 Oct 2007
|
The comment at that point could have been taken either way, IMO. But I will say that he was spot on with the way Putin is pretty much having his way with Bush, it's becoming painfully obvious and has been for quite sometime.
Overall he appears somewhat western friendly, but who knows. His rhetoric could just all be mere public consumption. How ya doing, buddy?
The alleged purpose of antitrust laws was to protect competition; that purpose was based on the socialistic fallacy that a free, unregulated market will inevitably lead to the establishment of coercive monopolies. But, in fact, no coercive monopoly has ever been or ever can be established by means of free trade on a free market. Every coercive monopoly was created by government intervention into the economy, by special privileges which closed the entry of competitors in a given field, by legislative action. ~Ayn Rand
Last edited by Zhuge Liang; Oct 20, 2007 at 02:07 PM.
|
Zhuge Liang