Wonderful Chocobo

Member 2483

Level 21.21

Mar 2006

|
Apr 2, 2006, 02:37 PM
Local time: Apr 2, 2006, 02:37 PM
|
#1 of 27
|
I do hope when you all say "Jurassic Park had the best CG ever" That you are referring to the third movie only.
Granted, while it is good, you have to keep in mind that for -most- of the Jurassic Park movies, especially the first one, they used puppets for the majority of the movie, that is why it looked so real. The only time they used CG was when the Dino's were on the move and they were moving fast, that's it.
I enjoyed every moment of Kong. I find it a bit sad that people in this day and age lack the intelligence to figure out that character development (that thing that happend before they got to the island? You know, the 'boring' part of the movie?) is equally as important as 'ZOMG DINOSAURS!' But, people are entitled to their opinion, so I can't really argue with that.
Jackson makes entertaining movies, that is hands down the truth, and if you notice, none of recent films have been cheap, acted poorly, nor have looked unimpressive...for the most part it's extremely high quality, can't argue with that.
As for the fakeness of the CG, watch Spiderman 2 someday, the CG in that movie is crap. On the topic of how bad the cg is in this movie, it seems, look at the bronto scene...everyone who was in that scene had to act with no knowledge of what was going on around them...so I think they did a damn fine job molding the cg around the actors, and the actors did a fine fucking job of making it look intense.
Jam it back in, in the dark.
|