|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
MAN. I was totally going to write an email to the people who put her on back about 8 months ago. I stumbled across her show, and I LITERALLY wanted to climb into the TV and ring her motherfucking neck.
I hate her more than almost anyone on news television - INCLUDING Bill O'Reilly. At least he's funny to watch, you know? But this woman. She makes my skin crawl - much like Dr. Laura Schlessinger. There's another one I wish would be taken out behind the chemical shed and have "silenced." I do, however, have a horrible thing with obnoxious, annoying women. Jam it back in, in the dark. |
"The presumption of innocence" that a person is "innocent until proven guilty" is the Golden Thread that runs through (criminal) law. It was what is known as "common law" and although it has appeared in statutes (Acts and suchlike) and been varied from time to time, it is part of what people would consider "natural justice.' The criminal burden of proof is not that a person is guilty just because it is "more likely than not" that they did something, but if there is any "reasonable doubt" about guilt, then that person is entitled to be acquitted. That is the "burden of proof" in criminal trials and it rests upon the precept that a person is only "guilty" after a fair trial - or as you may say "due process of law." There's nowhere I can't reach. |