|
Scratch all of that, we're losing sight of what this case was actually about, which is that the police conducted the search wrongly and that the victims are entitled to compensation. Both sides went into the case under the assumption that the warrant was proper.
|
I may be a complete fool, but since when are the authorities obligated to pay any compensation for wrongful actions on their behalf?
People have been locked up for years and years while being innocent of a crime they were convicted of. After being determined as innocent, they were set free, with no compensation (that I read about) for the years of life the authorities claimed from them.
Why would the authorities be obligated to pay compensation over a much smaller issue?
Besides, I thought that the police are "immune" to having to pay damages or whatever in cases like these. I could be wrong, since, you know, I'm not an expert.
There's nowhere I can't reach.