Cubed World-Whatever Happened to Them? (Plus, a few of their rips)

I think I was second on the amount of rips on that site for a long tie. I miss my little silver standing . . .
Anyway, if cubed redesigns the site, I'd want it to be a little more open to styles of rips, rather than the strict rules of format that existed before. My rips are always done 001-xxx, not by what songs fit on a cd. For me, that's a waste of time. I know some like it because it feels like a full OST, but I like knowing how many songs are in the game at quick glance.
I love seeing that WarioWare Twisted, for example, had 322 individual tracks, whereas my WarioWare Touched rip had 254 tracks. MAN those took a long time, and would take a VERY long time to post on the old cubed world site.
Perhaps a better way to do it would be to set up two formats and have rippers pick which one was best. Or, if a ripper didn't want to upload each track, just have a placeholder for a zip that would contain everything.

It's just something to think about cubed. Wanted to throw in my two cents!

Most amazing jew boots

Originally Posted by Dubble

You cant (and shouldnt) try to please everybody dude =\

I wasn't implying that he should. I was just giving suggestions so the site would be more user friendly to all ripper styles. I see very few that actually use the disc format that was preferred by the last site. It's Tappy's preferred method, but most just list it out.

Originally Posted by cubed

But I want my website to be accessible to as much people as I can. It's more in that way I meant, cause I know it's impossible to please everybody. Cause I'd be in politics, instead =\

That's good.
Consider that instead of having such a strict method (like with the disc naming and disc size), that all rips would fit into a more loose method.
Simply have it where you can list all the tracks you need with no disc info. Then those that use the separate disc method would just label out their rip, and it would be much easier for everyone. Let me give examples, I'm having a hard time putting it into words.
K, so I have my rip that's 198 tracks long, then I choose 198 tracks, fill in the titles, and upload the material. easy.
Now I have a rip that spans 3 discs with 50 tracks per disc. Most rippers that use this method will label them 01-50 for each disc. Instead of me reorganizing my entire rip, they'd just build it like this:
Disc 1:
101
102
etc.
150
Disc 2:
201-250
And so on. Actually, some rippers that use this method already number rips like this. It's less work for them than it is for me.
That's all I'm saying.

There's nowhere I can't reach.