 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 222 Level 36.56 Mar 2006 
|
Didn't the Halo 2 map pack originally cost $20?
How can you expect a developer to continue development on something and not expect that investment to be returned by way of some form of revenue generating thing. They can set their price at $15 or $20 as long as they are giving you good value for your money. They wouldn't be able to be successful if they continually offered content like two multiplayer maps for that price, or something similar. Jam it back in, in the dark. I didn't say I wouldn't go fishin' with the man.
All I'm sayin' is, if he comes near me, I'll put him in the wall. |
Member 222 Level 36.56 Mar 2006
|
Fixing any problems with the game should be done in patches and considered maintenance, not content. I wouldn't pay $20 for like 4 maps. I wouldn't pay $15 for some maps and some tiny amount of additional content. I wouldn't pay $10 for a glorified bug fixing patch. But if they want to offer a significant amount of new content, then I can see paying $20 for it. I don't know how many of you are familiar with Diablo II, but the 1.10 patch would be something I would consider the benchmark for a $10 content download.
There's nowhere I can't reach. I didn't say I wouldn't go fishin' with the man.
All I'm sayin' is, if he comes near me, I'll put him in the wall. |
russ