|
"Weeaboo" doesn't really bother me (I'm Asian, I live in Asia, I can damn well enjoy Asian entertainment without having to feel guilty about it), but still, considering that we can enjoy Disney movies, American cartoons and pop music without getting called names, you have to wonder why Westerners are derided for enjoying anime and J-pop/K-pop/whatever-pop.
|
If Japanese America-philes are even half as annoying as the majority of their Western counterparts, then maybe they should get called names.
Try 4%.
Granted, the system isn't perfect, and this only helps with guessing the on-yomi (Chinese reading) of the kanji, but I have heard that after learning a certain number of kanji, it does become possible to guess at meanings and pronunciation.
|
Keyword being "guess." Your point would be much stronger if each radical had a standard pronunciation and 90% of pronunciations could be determined from the combination of radicals or vice versa, but even in the original Chinese this is simply not the case.
|
Quote:
As for English, it's easy for you to dismiss examples I give as "exceptions," but if spelling is so intuitive, why do we have spelling tests? Why does most people's spelling suck? Why was this article written?
Someone who only has studied the alphabet and learned about what vowels and consonants are isn't going to have good spelling. Even with a decent "speaking" vocabulary, in writing, it would not be unexpected to see a child misspell words, substituting in what they feel are more intuitive spellings. An educated adult will certainly do better, because they will have gotten lots of reading practice, and will be used to English conventions. For instance, if you ask a child to spell the word "phonetically," it probably won't go so well, because they aren't used to the Ph- F sound, and even if they are, may not recognize that this is a root word being used in this longer construction.
|
I'll be the first to say that English is a very hard language to learn because of all the exceptions. However, there are conventions, and if you learn them you will be able to spell the majority of words correctly without looking up a dictionary. The reason spelling tests and articles like this exist is that people don't bother learning these conventions.
|
Quote:
All I'm saying is being able to break down words into subcomponents is really useful for spelling correctly in English, and likewise being able to break down words and kanji in Japanese into subcomponents is also useful.
|
That may have been what you meant, but you ended up basically saying that spelling is a different form of the radical system, which it isn't, especially for languages that are more internally consistent than English.
|
Quote:
I was talking about being able to guess meaning/pronunciation when seeing a new word in print. You're talking about hearing a word and then putting it to print yourself.
|
I'm also saying that if you know English well enough, you don't *have* to guess as to pronunciation. I don't know how it is in Japanese, but if you're given a new Chinese character, no matter how well you know the language, that's the best you can do...guess. The radical for "wood" is pronounced
mu. The word for "woods" (made of two "wood" radicals) is pronounced
lin. While the meaning is intuitive, the pronunciation is completely unrelated.
I would attribute that more to culture and education. A spelling system that's actually phonetic also helps, I'd imagine.
|
Quote:
But then, it doesn't seem like you really meant it seriously, so nevermind.
|
Man I just gained like 10 backpedal levels.
That's assuming you're not already there OSNAP.
|
whatever that stupid word is derived from...
|
Wow long post is long.
Edit:
Haha I just noticed this.
|
Originally Posted by Scarletdeath
Dhsweeaboo
|
Too great for words. This just got freakin' REAL.
I was speaking idiomatically.