HAY GUYS

Paper Crane · Nov 25, 2007, 12:10 AM

Does the fact that a few lives were lost balance out with many times more saved in future?

A fair bit of modern western medicine is based on animal and human experimentation. If we do not support the idea of doing so, how can we justify using the discoveries? We have been justifying the past, not to do so in the present and future seems hypocritical.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Paper Crane · Nov 25, 2007, 12:57 PM

Originally Posted by Traveller87

which wouldn't exist, if it weren't for that specific purpose, anyway.

I'm going out on a limb here, but if you use the cells in a person, the cells are alive. You therefor save both the cells and the person. We could look at this as research into saving cells that would be usually thrown away and eventually die.

How ya doing, buddy?