HAY GUYS

Stealth · Local time: Mar 12, 2006, 02:28 PM

Not to mention that the rest of the battle group is designed to protect the carrier. That's why they exist. They'd never touch our carriers, don't kid yourselves. (Yes, before someone brings up the USS Cole, I'm talking about conventional warfare.)

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Stealth · Local time: Mar 12, 2006, 03:35 PM

Use of a nuclear weapon on a CBG? Right, that's very conventional warfare.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Stealth · Local time: Mar 12, 2006, 04:31 PM

Let me put this bluntly: Nukes are not used to halt a CBG, and it would be ridiculous of Iran to waste a nuclear warhead on trying to stop ONE single CBG on a manuever that probably will not work.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Stealth · Local time: Mar 12, 2006, 04:40 PM

I'm assuming they wouldn't be using two warheads on a single battle group. Not to mention destroying a CBG wouldn't stop the US from crushing Iran.

I'll just stop humoring you. Nobody would use a nuclear weapon in a conventional style attack against a CBG. It's just not worth it.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Stealth · Local time: Mar 12, 2006, 09:13 PM

No, but I'm damn sure nobody in their fucking right mind would nuke a CBG. Also, Iran aren't the soviets. They aren't completely militarized, and have a weak fighting force. Do you really think they would be able to hurt a CBG with anything they currently have at their disposal? But hey, if it happens, you can call me on it.

I was speaking idiomatically.

Stealth · Local time: Mar 12, 2006, 10:22 PM

Have a source on that? You brought up the issue has "Russians have probably sold". I hardly consider that evidence. But I welcome any info you can find on it.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

Stealth · Local time: Mar 19, 2006, 12:25 AM

That's be a great way to piss off more Iraqis, democrats, and pretty much everyone else.

FELIPE NO

Stealth · Local time: Mar 19, 2006, 11:49 AM

Originally Posted by AlogiA

Oil?
How would you justify the occupation of Iraq?

You seem to be new at PP, so let me just tell you to pipe down before opening a can of worms. We've all argued to death on the implications of the Iraqi War. This thread is about Iran now.

Quote:

I smell a draft comming.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

Stealth · Local time: Mar 19, 2006, 11:38 PM

You have pretty much no evidence to make such a claim, other than dependent economies. Right.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Stealth · Local time: Mar 20, 2006, 06:20 PM

Here's the thing. China is growing at an alarming rate. Sooner or later, at the rate our the American Economic decline, and China's growth, they won't be as dependent on us as we are on them. Saying that China will never attack the US because they need us is beying ridiculous.

There's nowhere I can't reach.