|
Originally Posted by Slayer X
True, but Sony has developed the cell processor and Blu-Ray DVD player themselved which is what makes it more unique then the 360 and such (which is just a PC in a box) and is also the reason why it's more.
NES Oldskooler: That's the Premium PS3 which is $650 but if you want to compare that.
PS3 Premium: $650
Premium 360: $500 + HD-DVD $120 + Wi-Fi $100 = $720 (and you can't upgrade the harddrive from 20 GB now where the $650 PS3 has 60GB, nor do you have the HDMI)
|
The 360 isn't at $500.....the premium version of the XBox360 lies at $400 last I checked...Maybe you're gettin screwed over? o.O
Ironically, Sony themselves have said that the PS3 is basically a PC entertainment system. And Cell was not developed soley by Sony, it was a joint effort by Toshiba, Sony, and IBM.
Also, from your earlier post, numbers might be 32x that of the PS2, but numbers don't always equate exactly into performance. (I actually know nothing about the numbers, but I'm almost certain that nothing jumps up that much (32x) flawlessly without a few limitations and draw backs). New technology is always a gamble. There have been plenty of new things in the past. Some of them work wonderfully, some of them fail. I'm not saying that the PS3 is going to fail, but I think it's going a bit overboard on the numbers. As a result, the cost of the system suffers. It also takes a lot more power to run all those high tech things too, I wouldn't be surprised if that thing was running a bit on the hot side. Also, adding everything into one package isn't necessarily the best course of action. I'm sure there are people who don't need one feature or another, and at the same time, there are those who must simply have everything.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.