Fox GOP Post-Debate

Um, with the exception of the crowd (which gradually stepped across the line set by Fox News), it was EASILY the most well-run debate for either side, thus far, and contained the best set of questions. Speaking of babies and bathwater, it's not fair to lump Brit Hume and Chris Wallace (the 2 who run the serious shows on the channel) in with the rest of the Fox News broadcasters, especially after their stellar job in South Carolina.

I'm surprised that the National Review-type crowds praised Guiliani as the far-and-away winner. For me, he didn't do himself any favors (never mind his various stances) when he used Paul as a prop to puff out his chest. What an ass.

Me? Depending on the Democrats' choice for vice-president, I'd love to see a Mccain-Huckabee ticket. Hopefully, Huckabee would have his various problems (in my eyes) adjusted after 4 or 8 years under Mccain and could make a run himself.

Of course, that's just my opinion.

"At this point I'm pretty sure most people would be open to all of Paul's views with the exception of the Gold Standard, and that's only one knock against him in a gaggle of Neoconservative sadsacks and War Party Dems."

Naw. Sooner or later, even the slowest of people would recognize that he'd never marshal support in the legislative branch or his executive branch's own bureaucracy. He'd be a lame duck by year 2.

Most amazing jew boots

As much as you may like the man, let's not pretend like the majority of the American public has nuanced political thought. The GOP's fate is wholly unrelated to what you posted.

There's nowhere I can't reach.