 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 20358 Level 16.99 Feb 2007 |
I don't want to bring this topic off-track, but I would like to respond to those who asked by stating that Christian theology requires that the Adam and Eve section of Genesis be true (though everything else could, I suppose, be figurative). The absolute dependence on the story and the concepts behind it are why Christians are - and should be - concerned and intellectually curious about it.
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
Member 20358 Level 16.99 Feb 2007 |
"*Edit* Guess I should add my two cents about Adam and Eve. Eve is a invention of the King James version of the Bible. The Geneva bible, and I assume the bible versions before it (never researched it further), contains a snake-headed woman who is almost pagan in concept (some have referred to her as the Christian Medusa). Also no reference to the devil 'snake'/apple scene in the Geneva bible either. The snake and Eve were added in the King James version of the bible due to the hostility people had at that time with concepts they considered pagan."
tomb, while I won't begin to criticize your other points, I'd really appreciate you deleting this. I'd hate to lose respect for you so quickly. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
GhaleonQ