Furor Over Baptist's 'Gay Baby' Article

It is rather intriguing. For theologically orthodox and conservative Christians, the disposition toward homosexual acts is an uncommon, crippling tendancy toward a sin that would typically not even be a possibility. However, most also believe that prenatal manipulation is unnecessary and immoral in itself. I think that, politically, this will be fascinating to watch, as we'll see a split between divisions not seen since the early 1700's: fatalists (people shouldn't be obsessed with extending or "fixing" human bodies or minds, because the soul matters most) versus those subject to new medicine (physical and mental well-being comes first, after which conversion is done).

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Dhsu seems to sum it up rather nicely. I suppose that those supporting that opinion can argue that they are not "boosting" the innate abilities of anyone, but merely creating a reasonable baseline for physical traits. Consider it the social equivalent of subsidies for the poor.

There's nowhere I can't reach.