Nov 27, 2007, 02:46 PM
Local time: Nov 27, 2007, 01:46 PM
|
#1 of 121
|
So, I'm confused. Where are people getting that she was in an affair?
If I read the article correctly, she was meeting with this man because he was blackmailing her, claiming he had a compromising photo of her. She went to the gulf to meet him and they were attacked. The photo, was in fact an innocent photo and the man tries to blame the woman for the attack. I understand the woman broke the law, but it seems like she was blackmailed into it, therefore any statements saying that she knew she was breaking the law, she was having an affair, etc are false.
Zeph: She and her lawyer DID appeal. Did you read the article at all? I fail to see how attempting to enforce basic human rights is being a cry baby. The lawyer even states that the ruling goes against recent reforms in the current justice system.
Jam it back in, in the dark.
Last edited by The_Melomane; Nov 27, 2007 at 02:48 PM.
|
The_Melomane