 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Syklis Green
 Member 1892 Level 7.28 Mar 2006 
|
Is there a particular reason you need to avoid recompression? I should've asked that in your other thread. Unless you've got extremely volatile images, I don't see any reason why you'd need to go to such extremes to avoid recompression. And if they're that affected by compression, why aren't you simply using a lossless format? Just sayin'.
Most amazing jew boots |
|
Syklis Green
Member 1892 Level 7.28 Mar 2006
|
Yes, his source data's already in JPEG, I know that. But why keep it in JPEG if it's going to adversely impact the graphical data? Did he have a choice initially to not use JPEG at all on the data? If your image that affected by lossy compression, there isn't a need to use JPEG, ever. If it isn't greatly affected, who cares. I can tell a JPEG when I see one, and for the most part I don't cringe, unless it's on something like pixel art.
That's all. Uh, good luck though! :D How ya doing, buddy? |
Overkill