Libertarianism: Marxism of the Right?

I understand this is a criticism but I say this is just another termite chewing holes in a tasty structure that took time for people to build.

As a Christian I am called to talk about my faith and convince others to believe by presenting my own testimony and tackling failures of other belief systems with my own rule book the Bible.

But this guy doesn't. He just slams and slams. This is all too common these days, people running around with axes taking swings at any sort of discipline or belief system as if its virtuous to do so and not attempt to defend their own position in contrast to the one they are attempting to tear down.
His format is weak and ineffective because it doesn't solve anything or invites dialogue. Just another crybaby who is screaming for a bottle to shut him up.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by Kalekkan

I think perhaps you totally miss the point of what Locke is trying to say. This article seems to indicate that he thinks libertarianism challenges any sense of virtue and order, and that people would not be capable of restraining themselves and making their own decisions with the gift of freedom.

If this is the case, I have a question. What is the source by which the terms virtue & order is defined that gives a backbone to what was stated.
It helps me to know where the critique starts and attempts to finish.

There's nowhere I can't reach.