Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85242 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Political Palace
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


China may change 'one child' population policy
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Bradylama
Banned


Member 18

Level 51.14

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2008, 04:17 PM Local time: Mar 2, 2008, 04:17 PM #1 of 52
The 1 child policy was a result of Deng Xiaoping's mistaken conclusion that low birthrates are a cause of affluence instead of the result of it. The issue has never been about overpopulation for China in any realistic terms. Quite simply, the hundreds of millions of Chinese that could have been alive today (or at least exist within the system) are a resource lost to China forever. The whole policy has been criminally stupid from the get-go.

Jam it back in, in the dark.
Bradylama
Banned


Member 18

Level 51.14

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2008, 06:41 PM Local time: Mar 2, 2008, 06:41 PM #2 of 52
That's hard to do for a country with a vast amount of farmers, but the boys before girls mentality is highly overstated, and isn't nearly as bad as it is in India, which despite having no formal birth limit policy still has a gender discrepancy.

The gender discrepancy on paper is solely the fault of the CCP.

There's nowhere I can't reach.
Bradylama
Banned


Member 18

Level 51.14

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2008, 09:32 PM Local time: Mar 24, 2008, 09:32 PM #3 of 52
lumping in forced abortions and infanticide with murder itt

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
Bradylama
Banned


Member 18

Level 51.14

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2008, 10:51 PM Local time: Mar 24, 2008, 10:51 PM #4 of 52
Never said anything about abortions. And you're going to tell me it's not murder when they're infants? So when is it murder? When they're 3 years and 2 days?
Wasn't talking to you, chumley.

But yeah, I wouldn't necessarily lump in socially forced infanticide with murder. For all intents and purposes, it's a late-term abortion unless it's been forced by the state or somebody else, which isn't what chibi neko is implying.

Though I guess it's murder if abortion services are easily available. It's a little complicated, but basically I'm saying chibi neko is kinda racist.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?
Bradylama
Banned


Member 18

Level 51.14

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 02:56 PM Local time: Mar 25, 2008, 02:56 PM 1 #5 of 52
Sigh.... dude, please re-read my posts, I never said anything about killing, or a specific country, just a idea of everyone having 1 or 2 kids, but that is idealistic so we know its not going to happen. Trying to twist what I am trying to say is only pulling this thread off topic. I am just going to end it with that.
Except you claim that the Chinese are killing their daughters because of gender preferences, which isn't true and means that these kids become adopted or unofficially raised within the family far more often than they're actually killed.

This gender discrepancy is either leaving the country, or only on paper, but you continue insisting upon these Chinese Baby Girl Murder myths as though they are true so what the Hell is wrong with you?

And yeah, mandating 1 or 2 children a household implies forced abortions, so you are basically advocating state sanctioned murder, good job you fucking idiot.

I was speaking idiomatically.
Bradylama
Banned


Member 18

Level 51.14

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2008, 02:23 AM Local time: Mar 26, 2008, 02:23 AM #6 of 52
Look, it's simply a matter of how economically beneficial children are to the economy, it GDP or higher education doesn't matter. If you could train drones to perform menial labor for the rest of their lives it would still be to their disadvantage to have children assuming children can't be drones.

We don't have much kids because nowadays it's a lifestyle choice, whereas in an agricultural economy those extra hands are an economic necessity.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?
Bradylama
Banned


Member 18

Level 51.14

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2008, 12:47 PM Local time: Jul 19, 2008, 12:47 PM 2 #7 of 52
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Political Palace > China may change 'one child' population policy

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.