HAY GUYS

Bradylama · Local time: Nov 27, 2007, 04:29 AM

I'm not a very good shot.

Well Christ, Paco that's because you're not fucking Robocop and should always aim for center mass, that guy could've killed you. =/

They weren't breaking in to his own house so he can't claim he was protecting his property, and there's no evidence to suggest that his person was in danger. I'm not sure how this doesn't qualify as murder, exactly.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Bradylama · Local time: Nov 27, 2007, 04:54 AM

Originally Posted by Tawnee Van Pelt

Brady feeling worried for Paco, I'm bursting into tears!

YouTube Video

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Bradylama · Local time: Nov 27, 2007, 06:24 PM

Originally Posted by Gechmir

Anyhow, let's not forget the screwy frivolous lawsuits that result from letting criminals live. I remember a few years back someone putting a slug in to some fucker's knee-cap, and HE ended up getting sued by the criminal that invaded his home.

Use of deadly force is usually justified when it's your own home that's being invaded. When there's enough reason to believe that your person could be in danger.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Bradylama · Local time: Nov 28, 2007, 05:07 PM

Whether or not the cops could have caught them is immaterial to the issue at hand. The fact is that they didn't represent a threat to the shooter's property or person. Therefore he was putting himself in danger, and can't claim a legitimate cause for use of deadly force.

He confronted them and initiated force. He came out with a loaded weapon and escalated the situation. The responsibility for the deaths of the robbers rest squarely on the shooter, and I don't see how that's not murder.

People don't get away with manslaughter and that's accidental. The shooter intentionally made things more dangerous for everybody. Absolving him of any wrongdoing is mind boggling.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?