Bush is a crook.

One interpretation of an intentional botched invasion of Iraq is that the military is used as a destabilizing force in an oil-heavy region. Driving up the price of oil, as a result, and increasing the value of oil futures. This makes oil interests very happy, but as a result, it also encourages market shifts towards alternative methods of fuel.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Quote:

For someone who's supposedly involved in the law I'd think you'd know the difference between pedophilia (which is typically forced rape) and statutory rape.

All rape is considered forced (otherwise it wouldn't be rape yuk durr).

Statuotory rape is a default status that occurs when one of the parties is considered to be mentally incapable of providing consent.

Pedophilia is the state of being attracted to sexually undeveloped people. Prosecuting people for being pedophiles would constitute as a thought crime, because in being a pedophile, one only thinks about or wants to have sex with children.

When one actively plans out and executes the attempted statuory rape of a child is when one crosses the line of being a pedophile to being a prospective kid-diddler.

That is the difference, because whether or not the person being propositioned is actually a child, the suspect in question has still intended to rape one. Attempted Rape.

Idiot thieves aren't let off the hook because their attempted robbery didn't fall through and nothing was actually stolen.

End of the fucking discussion.

Any further discussion about whether or not soliciting a perceived child is actually kid-diddling will not be tolerated. Talk about Bush suks, but this shit is absolutely objective, and no amount of niggerdom will change that.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

And the age of consent is an establishment of the ability to provide consent. Since the offering of consent requires certain mental faculties, one who is under the age of consent is considered incapable of providing it. Thus, it is assumed that they lack the capacities (mental ones) to provide consent.

Quote:

This is not true, not by legal definition. This is something I do know, as I have dealt with people on both sides of the issue.

Whether or not one has been violently raped or given into pressures does not mean that one case excludes the presence of force. If I threatened you into sucking my dick, and you relented, does that not constitute an act of force via threat? I've essentially forced you to do something against your will with threat.

If an act of rape was consentual, then it wouldn't be rape.

Go back to Africa you fucking Jiggaboo.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Catching him is physically infeasable, I'm sorry to say. You can see those high-strength muscle fibers at work in his pedalling motion.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?