Norton Antivirus 2006

Originally Posted by Trigunnerz

Is Norton that bad? I've been using it for a few years now, and it hasn't given me any problems. It detects viruses when it comes, and deletes them accordingly. Maybe it helps that I have 1.5 gigs of RAM to run it.

It's not really that Norton itself is downright horrible, it's that there are better things available. (That and every version of Norton since... two years ago brings my computer to a crawl at boot; this isn't a memory issue, either: it's the service's start that takes forever--it has plenty of room in RAM for itself.)

How ya doing, buddy?

Originally Posted by Cyantre

I'm happy with NAV 2006. I trust Symantec since they've been around for several years. I wouldn't trust a new-comer to the AntiVirus scene. Also NIS2006 is the best program ever, simply because it comes with AntiSpam. I hate ads, so I love AntiSpam.

You do know that there are plenty of good (and free) alternatives to deal with spam, right?
Also, NIS2006 couldn't be the best program ever, because that would mean that it would work for everone (including me).

There's nowhere I can't reach.