|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
I'm confused. Why would they review an incomplete game? Who would want to read anything but a brief preview of something that's not even remotely finished?
"Yeah mang, this is our world exclusive in-depth review of Duke Nukem Forever............." "Gameplay is near non-existant. All you get is brief glimpses of what could and should have been, and it all (quickly) ends with a cheesy and cliche oneliner. We expected more from such a legendary series..............." Or has Spore actually been finished without me noticing? I haven't followed its development. I don't think Kotaku is shit per se, but a lot of their "informed" blurbs are embarrassingly opinionated. I'm all for blog/journal like quips in news stories, but some of this stuff is just really pathetic potshots at figures who don't deserve the backhand. Jam it back in, in the dark. ![]() |