Feb 4, 2010, 11:09 AM
|
4
#1 of 8
|
There are degrees of relevancy, Worm. Wikipedia has, for example, an article on Tusken Raiders. It's about three paragraphs. In the external links section, it directs you to Wookieepedia's article on the same topic, which is 30 paragraphs or longer. There is a REASON why Wikipedia does not include the vast, choking slabs of beefy Tusken Raider data that Wookieepedia contains, and the reason is this: 99% of that information is absolutely irrelevant to anyone except obsessive hobbyists.
If the Madonna song entry were in a wiki specifically designed for banal information about chord progression, that data would fit there. It doesn't really fit Wikipedia's general-purpose model for exactly the same reason 50,000 words of Tusken data doesn't fit.
(Referring to a pop song as "Vivaldian" is always pretty banal regardless of the context, though)
V too slow lardfat
Jam it back in, in the dark.
|