|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
| View Poll Results: Should we allow original tracks made at any time by a professional VGM composer? | |||
| Yes |
|
7 | 36.84% |
| Restrict to after first VGM credit |
|
7 | 36.84% |
| Other |
|
3 | 15.79% |
| Abstain/Don't care |
|
2 | 10.53% |
| Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Restricting nominations based upon career is the most sensible option.
If a composer cuts an original album in 1995, then he/she is simply a composer. There is no connection between the work and the VGM industry. If that composer is later credited on VGM albums, that material and any subsequent original works would be fair game because, by that time, the composer has added the title of "VGM Composer" to his/her resume. I don't really see any more practical perspective here. Jam it back in, in the dark. ![]() |
There's nowhere I can't reach. ![]() |
Your idea, aviness, is interesting but it's really secondary to the particular issue being asked here. We're just trying to establish whether an artist's status as a VGM composer is acceptably retroactive.
Your proposal has more to do with how often their independent work may be nominated. We're talking about backwards eligibility here, not frequency thereof. I responded to your idea in the other poll thread. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. ![]() |