Bush is a crook.

Originally Posted by Bradylama

End of the fucking discussion.

Originally Posted by Patty

Okay, fine by me. I won't say anything else about that in that case.

You did say something, though, that I feel the need to address, if anything to be informative . . .

How many moderators have to tell you to drop the statutory rape subject?

Bush is a crook. DISCUSS.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by Peppermint Patty

He didn't say anything about the statutory rape subject. He said, and I quote: "Any further discussion about whether or not soliciting a perceived child is actually kid-diddling will not be tolerated." That's a different subject. The definition of statutory rape is something he just now brought up.

I find this response to be argumentative for its own sake. You know damn well what I meant when I told you to get back onto topic and you chose to split hairs.

In between the time I last viewed this thread and now, this discussion has gone nowhere except in the tiny, little circle-jerk you wish it to. Despite the urgings of several moderators who've pointed out, verbatim, where you've broken rules and crossed lines, you continue to nitpick and whine about a subject that is far to the left of this thread's original intent. You've been asked to return to the original discussion but have only lead it further astray.

I don't normally put my foot down in the Political Palace, but your arrogance and impudence in the face of the resident authority prompt me to take uncharacteristic action.

I declare this thread CLOSED.

Patty, if you continue to behave in this manner, in other threads, I will strongly push for disciplinary action. Debate is fair, but when a moderator tells you to do something, arguing semantics of that demand for the next page and a half is completely unacceptable.

It's not hard to keep people out of entire forums, you know.

There's nowhere I can't reach.