Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85242 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Political Palace
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


Supreme Court to Look at 2nd Amendment
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Gumby
DANGEROUS WHEN WET


Member 1389

Level 22.25

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2007, 03:15 PM Local time: Nov 16, 2007, 10:15 PM #1 of 34
Iraqi insurgents are also more likely to be armed with military grade weaponry. In the United States, ownership of such weaponry can range from restricted to illegal, depending on what just it is.
That isn't necessarily accurate. We are fighting against AK variant rifles and crude but effective explosives. Besides what do you consider "military grade weaponry"?

Regardless of what the courts rule on this case I will not give up my firearms.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

"In a somewhat related statement. Hugging fat people is soft and comfy. <3" - Jan
"Jesus, Gumby. You just...came up with that off the top of your head?" - Alice
Gumby
DANGEROUS WHEN WET


Member 1389

Level 22.25

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Nov 19, 2007, 01:22 PM Local time: Nov 19, 2007, 08:22 PM #2 of 34


It was really "beer arms". Someone just misread it.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

"In a somewhat related statement. Hugging fat people is soft and comfy. <3" - Jan
"Jesus, Gumby. You just...came up with that off the top of your head?" - Alice
Gumby
DANGEROUS WHEN WET


Member 1389

Level 22.25

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Nov 20, 2007, 06:06 PM Local time: Nov 21, 2007, 01:06 AM #3 of 34
That said, restrictive gun laws reduce crime as well. Look at Japan for evidence of that, which has phenomenally low crime rates.
That is not true. It is not so simple to say that "restrictive gun laws reduce crime". Restrictive gun laws do not reduce crime. Switzerland is the perfect example of that. The dynamics of the United States and that of Japan are different. Japan has never had a civilian population in recent history who was armed the way the American people are.

45% increase in Australia’s armed robberies since gun ban

Take Australia for example. Yes the government passed a ban on just anything that can throw a piece of hot lead but the population still remains armed and crime rates went up. In Japan the police have complete authority when it comes to the issuing licenses to own for example a shotgun. It is not uncommon to spend a year or more in prison for illegal possession of a firearm or sword. The Japanese police also have a great deal more power than American police. They can search at will and their courts allow illegally seized evidence.

The American and Japanese people are VERY different and if you think we can enact laws modeled after Japan then you are very fool hardy. The Japanese may tolerate that level of gun legislation and police authority but I doubt you could get anything close to the level of Japanese gun control laws passed here in the USA.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

"In a somewhat related statement. Hugging fat people is soft and comfy. <3" - Jan
"Jesus, Gumby. You just...came up with that off the top of your head?" - Alice

Last edited by Gumby; Nov 20, 2007 at 06:53 PM.
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Political Palace > Supreme Court to Look at 2nd Amendment

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.