Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85242 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > General Discussion
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


Brain-damaged woman sued by Wal-Mart
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Leknaat
Evil


Member 137

Level 34.72

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2008, 10:01 PM #1 of 72
"We're being fair to the associates." Right, ask the other associates what they think of this.

This should be the exception that MAKES the rule.

How ya doing, buddy?
Leknaat
Evil


Member 137

Level 34.72

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 27, 2008, 02:09 PM #2 of 72
Am I the only one who noticed that Wal-Mart waited three years before suing them? They were notified by the attorney about the decision, and didn't take immediate action. Isn't there a statute of limitations on something like that?

There's nowhere I can't reach.
Leknaat
Evil


Member 137

Level 34.72

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2008, 05:26 AM #3 of 72
Good point.

I also feel Wal-Mart is being a bit of a dick, but on the other hand, they did write it in the small print. Ignorance is not bliss in a court of law.
There is something that bothers me. What IS the small print, anyway? Does it say, "In the event damages are collected, Wal-Mart will sue for the return of monies paid?" Or does it say, "In the event damages are collected, Wal-Mart retains the right to sue for monies paid?"

The first phrasing warns the person that it will happen, and the second that it might. With the second phrasing, Wal-Mart would still be upholding the contract even if they didn't sue.

I wish I had a copy of the contract....

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > General Discussion > Brain-damaged woman sued by Wal-Mart

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.