Didn't anyone READ the article?
|
Quote:
"Our intention is not to actually put this into law," he said. "All we want is to get this on the ballot and cause people to talk about it."
The group's Web site gives another reason: "And at the very least, it should be good fun to see the social conservatives who have long screamed that marriage exists for the sole purpose of procreation be forced to choke on their own rhetoric."
|
It's not intended to be made into a law. It's intended to get people to
think.
Jam it back in, in the dark.