HAY GUYS

Leknaat · 08:35 PM

I am currently sitting here watching MSNBC, and they are covering this breaking story.

A 42-year-old American former teacher named John Mark Karr--who used to live near the Ramseys in Colorado--was arrested in Thailand on a unrelated sex charge, and while being held, related several facts about the JonBenet case that only the murderer would know about.

If his DNA matches the unknown DNA found in JonBenet's underwear--we have the murderer. He is currently being extradited and should be here in two days.

If he is the murderer--this case took only ten years to solve. (sarcasm)

So, do you think if the police had focused on the evidence, and not the family at first--trying to fit the evidence to the family--do you think the case would have been solved sooner?

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Leknaat · Aug 17, 2006, 01:14 AM

Originally Posted by ORLY

With that being said, the police (and other government bodies in general) don't always have the most efficient ways of doing things (like the mountains of paperwork the police have to do for everything). Plus, you can see a lot of things that you should have done in using the great gift of hindsight.

Thank you for being the only one to answer the question.

There's nowhere I can't reach.