 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 136 Level 37.96 Mar 2006 
|
There is definitely no room for more. They should have a policy of no kids for 20 years. The population is still growing and if the one child policy remains, the population will still increase until the year 2050, then start seeing a decline.
If it wasn't for Mao Zedong and his "have as many babies as you can" policy 40 years ago, the population of China would be about half of what it is.... grrr... Jam it back in, in the dark. |
Member 136 Level 37.96 Mar 2006
|
Really? Wicked. I guess its my first time being insensitively cruel. Strike one I guess.
 Seriously though, they need to stick with the one child rule, otherwise things will get worse in terms of resource restraints, and room for population. The world could handle a lot more people. The biggest problem is that one human takes up space and resources, which limits the amount of sustainable population. So, as a result, the world cannot hold as much. If China were to remove their limit of one child, it would further strain the world demand as a whole. In terms of interest, what would be the most vile idea so far? There's nowhere I can't reach.
Last edited by The Wise Vivi; Mar 2, 2008 at 03:56 PM.
|
Member 136 Level 37.96 Mar 2006
|
As for as I know, if the government finds out about having two kids, you have to pay the government a sum of money, and possibly other requirements.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
The Wise Vivi