my theory

See, the problem with this is "conscience". Everybody can believe killing is right, but a person's natural conscience will always tell them that it is wrong, until their conscience is desensitized.

Thread closed?

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Oh, sorry. I should've been clearer in my rebuttal:

You have a theory, I have an exception. I fully understand what you're saying, but I believe it's quite situational. As with all theories, when an exception is provided, the theorist must accomodate for the exception or discard any past conjectures.

"My theory states that the majority of people make what is right and wrong." -you

"The urge to prefer right if right at the time if killing is correct." -also you


See the contradiction here? If your theory cannot explain itself, then change it so that it can. Thanks.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

insertnamehere, I was just wondering, do you have a religion? Or another preference, such as agnosticism, atheism, etc?

It'd be easier to discuss this interesting theory knowing your moral background.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Originally Posted by insertnamehere

Well im atheist but does that really matter

I can't argue with you anymore, on the basis that you are a fool.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

I'm an idiot? I'm far from an idiot. I have a 4.0 at my university, and teach MCAT classes (read: medical school admission test preparation classes).

My basis on calling you a fool was not one of insult, but of common sense, to better you as a person. Look at the world around you, it did not happen by accident. Nothing happens by accident, and even if it does, it's someone's accident. That is my basis for anti-atheism. Prove me wrong.

Double Post:
Also, I will cease to post in this thread, as it is a waste of time to argue with fools.

Later.

I was speaking idiomatically.