|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
The decision illustrated the left wing idea that then needs of the government outweigh the needs of the individual. The government needs a larger tax base, so they take the land of individuals and give it to private developers who then develop the land to bring in more tax revenue. So the guise is that the higher tax revenue is for the public good since that tax money can be used, in theory, to benefit the entire community. In reality the ruling just enriches the already wealthy and redistributes wealth.
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
It is at its heart a leftist idea. Confiscating private property for the betterment of the state reeks of Marxism. Taking the prpoerty from one private owner and transferring it to another private owner so the state can benefit can also be said to lean towards fascism/ A look at those on the court who favored this ruling will tell you what side of the political aisle they come down on.
As far as the contention that this is a right wing idea, American conservatives have always championed private property rights. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
"Promoting economic development is a traditional and long-accepted function of government," wrote Justice Stevens for the majority. Sounds like an endorsement of the behavior to me. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |