Sup staypuft.
Member 1276
Level 19.09
Mar 2006
|
Mar 10, 2006, 03:13 AM
Local time: Mar 10, 2006, 01:13 AM
|
#1 of 178
|
Sure, the woman has to put up with the pregnancy, but that means that SHE wants to pay for the financial burden of upbringing the child, but men do not have a choice in the matter.
Quite frankly, that's bullshit. There is no 100% anti-birth control, so the fact is that if something goes wrong, the guy gets fucked if the girl gets pregnant and decides to carry it to term.
The way this system is worked out, we would likely need a signed contract of some sort to prevent any sort of unwanted pregnancy becoming a financial burden for us men, and even then I'm not sure if that would hold up in any court of law.
The fact of the matter is: If the man has to retain any sort of responsibility to the child, financial or otherwise, then he should have a choice in the matter as to abortions or financial obligations. This is some seriously one-sided crap. I respect the 9 months women go through for childbirth, but cutting men out of a process that has LIFETIME financial rammifications for them is just plain stupid.
Jam it back in, in the dark.
|
Similar Threads
JasonTerminator