|
Originally Posted by Kensaki
I actually disagree on that. I can pick out much more dung from the PS1 era than the SNES era. But perhaps that has something with me being less picky about my games then.
|
I'm very picky myself, and I was aware while writing that post that it was an oversimplification. Allow me to express my thoughts more clearly.
There is a greater volume of games for PS1 than for SNES overall, and it's true that there is a huge, honking great pile of horrdendous, pathetic, abysmal games for PS1. However, due to the greater size of the overall catalogue, this still means that there are more titles of a worthwhile nature than on the SNES, in my opinion. The quality bell-curve peaks a little lower on the PS1 than on the SNES, but the gems are there, if you want to look for them.
You're right, though. The average standard is not higher, it's just that with more games overall, the yield of quality titles can be good, even with a poor ratio of weak to strong titles. Some of the best titles for SNES never got translated into English, officially at least, so they were never really available to English-speaking gamers. I tend to not count those, no matter how good they were.
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?