HAY GUYS

Hachifusa · Local time: Jul 3, 2008, 10:55 PM

Well, to be fair, Texas' Castle Doctrine means that individuals are legally entrusted to shoot and kill people that are on their property illegally.

So the question is really mainly ethical, as legally he really should have been indicted.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Hachifusa · Local time: Jul 5, 2008, 10:56 AM

Originally Posted by Night Phoenix

Based on what? The grand jury interpreted the law far differently than you and many of the other liberal anti-gun nuts in this thread have. Precedent has been set, so throw this 'should have' business out the window.

I actually meant "should NOT have been indicted"; I was trying to say that, according to the law, he was legally justified, and so really the issue is whether or not it should be legal, as was brought up later.

There's nowhere I can't reach.