|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
That's a pretty bad professor. I wondered why he didn't answer the student's question about "evolving from monkeys" with a sound no, too. Although both sides were pretty arrogant, there's a huge difference between induction and blind faith, as was said.
The other part was when the professor said "What is night if it isn't darkness?" This doesn't sound like a professor to me. Besides being wrong, it also smacks of biblical language. What bothers me is that stories like this serve two purposes to two different groups: to believers it's a way for them to feel comfortable that SOMEHOW science and faith can exist on top of each other, and for non-believers it's a way to say "Let's be apathetic and agnostic because no one knows!" Most amazing jew boots |
If the Old Testament is not true, then Christianity loses all validity. You'll have to try better than that.
For the record. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Still, I wasn't arguing about that, exactly, but the Christian interpretation. Anyone can read Jesus as a Jewish commentator in line with the other prophets; to convince people that he was the Messiah that had been predicted (not to mention warping other verses in the Old Testament to make him appear godly), it is necessary to accept the Old Testament as fact. While I am all for reading the Old Testament (and the New Testament, for the record) with a figurative outlook, I'd question any Christian about which verses they choose to be figurative and which literal. Case in point: Jews since before Jesus read the verse that predicts that the Messiah will hail from Bethlehem as meaning that he will be descended from King David (who was born there); the Christians created this entire story based on how a couple from Nazareth (Joseph and Mary) were somehow in Bethlehem when Mary gave birth. Clearly, they took the Old Testament a little more literally than the Jews, at that point. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
Last edited by Hachifusa; Nov 30, 2007 at 03:00 PM.
|
More technically, although you seem to have been speaking broadly, I know that the Church isn't exactly extra-biblical. After the Gospels, the New Testament is wrought with the history of the Church, or merely references. I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |