Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85242 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Political Palace
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


Disspelling Minimum Wage Myth.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Hachifusa
Pre-defined Avatar~


Member 121

Level 17.12

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2007, 05:19 PM Local time: Jan 15, 2007, 03:19 PM #1 of 45
It follows that government interference in the market will only create incidents like Wal-Mart's love of regulation. Wasn't it clear from the beginning that the nature of lassiez-faire was to protect businesses, much like the seperation of church and state was to protect churches?

For a more technical question, would abolishing minimum wage at this stage lower consumer prices all over the country?

Jam it back in, in the dark.
Hachifusa
Pre-defined Avatar~


Member 121

Level 17.12

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2007, 02:52 AM Local time: Jan 17, 2007, 12:52 AM #2 of 45

I also don't think the purpose of a "laissez-faire" economic policy is to "protect business." Protecting business is usually the realm of corporate welfare, breaking up strikes with police power, and military adventurism.
It is to protect business, just not in the sense that you mention. It protects a person's right to engage in business, free from the constraints of government. That's what 'lassiez-faire' economic policy is. Corporate welfare and military adventurism favors business above all else. That's like saying that the seperation of church and state is the same as installing a theocracy. Uh, no.

Christ, buddy, you love turning tables on everyone and being a dick, eh?

There's nowhere I can't reach.
Hachifusa
Pre-defined Avatar~


Member 121

Level 17.12

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2007, 03:17 AM Local time: Jan 17, 2007, 01:17 AM #3 of 45
My argument is semantical, and while you can claim that not interfering in exchanges and observing property rights benefits "business," I would claim that it benefits everybody in the sense that all people are consumers, yet not all people engage in business.

Laissez-Faire is the observance of free exchange, not protection of business.
You're right in that it's semantical. I was arguing that, in advocating free exchage, business is protected. So are consumers, for that matter. I guess I have to watch my ass when I throw around words and phrases so that I'm not misunderstood.

But to expand before on my question, I'll skip the original question and go on to the larger issue: if the minumum wage is clearly not the way to go, why in god's name are there so many Keynesians running around? I'm not talking about the average citizen who just likes a pay increase, but the learned economists who love to shout out that our government should index our wage against the cost of living and whatnot. Is America, or rather, the entirety of western civilization so blind?

Past that, how would Americans go about fixing the problems instilled by a minimum wage?

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Political Palace > Disspelling Minimum Wage Myth.

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.