|
My argument is semantical, and while you can claim that not interfering in exchanges and observing property rights benefits "business," I would claim that it benefits everybody in the sense that all people are consumers, yet not all people engage in business.
Laissez-Faire is the observance of free exchange, not protection of business.
|
You're right in that it's semantical. I was arguing that, in advocating free exchage, business is protected. So are consumers, for that matter. I guess I have to watch my ass when I throw around words and phrases so that I'm not misunderstood.
But to expand before on my question, I'll skip the original question and go on to the larger issue: if the minumum wage is clearly not the way to go, why in god's name are there so many Keynesians running around? I'm not talking about the average citizen who just likes a pay increase, but the learned economists who love to shout out that our government should index our wage against the cost of living and whatnot. Is America, or rather, the entirety of western civilization so blind?
Past that, how would Americans go about fixing the problems instilled by a minimum wage?
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.