|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
The whole Paul thing is a ruse anyway. Some very vocal supporters are spamming the Internet ways rather efficiently, pushing the stories onto Digg and voting in the online polls, but I never see a single Paul supporter in real life. That's why I suspect a giant covert ad campaign likely supported by a botnet.
There's nowhere I can't reach. |
I don't deny they exist - it's just that while I see piles of people publicly mentioning support or hatred for Clinton, Obama, Giuliani, and McCain, Paul is rarely ever mentioned except as "that libertarian nutjob who's got a few nice views but is way too crazy to take seriously".
Paul's marketting efforts on Digg and Reddit can hardly be declined - while in recent days Digg users have gotten fed up and started demoting as spam, there were a couple of solid months where 4-10 Paul stories made it to the front page each day and anyone daring to mention anything other than "ZOMG RON PAUL HAVE MY BEBIES" was rapidly dug down. We don't even Digg down Pro-RIAA people that fast - It HAD to be a botnet, plain and simple. Those online polls that Paulites keep pushing? They were listed on Digg and Reddit encouraging people who hasn't even watched the debates to vote for Paul. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
Last edited by Arainach; May 8, 2007 at 05:57 PM.
|
I think this interview pretty much sums up why no one takes him seriously and why no one should. The man is against the existence of the CIA, thinks the civil war shouldn't have happened (apparently we're just supposed to allow people to secede at will), and thinks a privatized FAA could have prevented 9/11 (I especially loved his rant about how letting people have guns on planes could have stopped it, without regard for the fact that, you know, if you fire a gun on a plane the whole thing will decompress and all hell will break lose).
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
The plane wouldn't explode, but decompression WOULD occur and there are any number of serious side-effects associated with it.
Also, way to ignore the entire point. How ya doing, buddy? |
Yes. But depressurizing a cabin STILL makes the plane incredibly difficult to control, etc.
Look, the fact of the matter is this: Even if Brady's nuts enough to agree with Paul, 99% of America realizes that the Civil War was a necessary thing, the CIA's benefits far outweight its occasional mistakes, and that people on planes should not have guns. Paul is fucked up, plain and simple, and 100 percent unelectable. What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
FELIPE NO |