|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
I like the idea that Homeland Security had to make sure to inform us that terrorists didn't attack Minnesota.
"Yeah, we thought about attacking Washington or NYC or Boston or Philly or LA or Dallas but we just couldn't pass up the opportunity to get those fuckers who drive across bridges in Minneapolis." Jam it back in, in the dark. |
Heh.
So: 1) A study is released in 2002 saying 30% of bridges, about 7,000, are in trouble. 2) In the 5-10 years since the 20,000+ bridges are looked at (I'd assume it would take a couple of years to produce), none fall down involving a fatality (there was one in SF a couple years ago, but that was because a truck exploded). 3) One bridge involving fatalities collapses 5 years after the study is released. 4) Congress goes apeshit, opening up the wallet. To pay to do what? Yeah, that's right: study all the bridges again! 5) In 2009 or 2010, when the study is complete, most people will have forgotten about Minnesota, meaning Congress does not release more funds to actually fix the bridges...just like after the 2002 study. 6) ??? 7) Profit!!! There's nowhere I can't reach. |
State Department of Transportation, Fed DoT, the original manufacturers of the bridge, the people working on the upgrades...it'll be class-action and they'll sue everyone to get all the documents they can before narrowing it down to one.
For example: if it's true that "they" knew the bridge had problems since 1990 and they still hadn't upgraded it by 2007, that certainly could be a valid lawsuit. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
![]() ![]()
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |