 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 1180 Level 28.87 Mar 2006 
|
I prefer a percentage scale myself. I feel that it is more precise that a /10 or /5 rating system, that is unless the /10 system allows for marks such as 8.2, then it is just as good as the percentage system.
I also feel that the reviewer should break down each element of the game (graphics, gameplay, sound, etc) and mark these each with a score of it's own, something like Gamespot do. I also like the way that Gamepot sums up it's reviews with a information box at the start of the review that covers the best and worst points in a nutshell. Most amazing jew boots  |
Member 1180 Level 28.87 Mar 2006
|
Yeah that's the sort of thing that I was on about. The review seems to cover all the important elements of a game, and has the summary points nicely laid out in a system that is clear and easy to understand. I like it.
Just a suggestion though. How about having the overall score at the top of the page next to the game title, or at least on the same row as the title, while keeping the summary of points down the bottom of the page. The score at the top of the page will then give visitors to your site a quick indication of what you thought of the game, rather than having to scroll down to the bottom of the page just to see what score the game got. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Domino