How old is too old?

Why does it have to be someone super special? Let me ask you this David, have you ever been in a situation where you might've been in danger of losing your virginity? I'm not attacking you, I'm just wondering if you've gotten offers and then proceeded to give it second thoughts.

I mean, yeah, girls will come and go and as you get older, women do the samething. The only foreseeable problem with waiting so long is that you build up this fantasy behind the encounter and when it happens you're not only sorely disappointed, but inexperienced and it will lead to serious heartbreak.

I know, it happened to a buddy of mine. It was partly my fault, I think, we took him out, he met a girl and she took him home that same night. Two days later, I get a call from him and he's in tears. My other friend and I were kind of perplexed by his reaction, until we had discussed it in passing, over time. She liked him, but she just wanted a night. Yeah, it happens, it's happened to me, too but I try to shrug it off, now. It's not like I didn't get anything out of it.

Why does sex always equate to longterm attachment? Isn't there merit in being able to share a few moments of genuine passion with someone else, even if it is just once or twice? I mean, it's not like I'll have sex with just anybody, either. However, when I meet a woman and I spend hours on end over nothing more than coffee and maybe a walk, and not notice time passing, then I think that's an indicator that I want to share with this person physically.

So, anyway, it's not going to come around by you standing by. Just try to let go of the anticipation and the build-up, because to be honest your first time can be disappointing.

Also, jacking off is fairly healthy, at least when you're younger, it helps curb some of the initial sensitivity and will enable you to last longer when it comes time.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Yeah, because you know, anyone who has sex is automatically sex crazed.

Personally, I don't think denying one of the natural pleasures (and necessities) of life is healthy. As long as he's not in complete denial of his sexuality, I really don't have a problem with people are virgins that are my age. I respect their view on the subject, as long as they have a reasonable outlook on what it means to be sexually active.

I like the incredibly stuffy attitude some people seem to have against sexual relationships. It's because we "need" it, like we're somekind of drug-fiend or something.

I could also make ludicrous comments about that crowd, too. Like they're a bunch of stuck-up assholes that can't see past their own noses and like to make themselves feel better by putting down those who recieve the physical attention that they themselves are so insanely jealous of. But, that's a narrow-minded, ignorant view and I know better than that.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

I like how automatically anyone who is sexually active is now automatically a carrier of an STD. I get regular check-ups, the military mandates this.

I know I'm clean, I don't just jump into bed with anybody and when I do get into bed with someone, it's only after taking a brief moment to ask "what do you use for protection?" Then, I whip out the jimmy-hat and go to town.

Condoms are pretty goddamned effective at stopping transmission of diseases. Also, if it's something that can be transmitted through contact of skin, say around the vaginal area, like from her inner thigh to my scrotum, there're typically visual cues by the time it's advanced enough to be infectious.

I'm not saying sex is the greatest thing, ever. But, if you know what you're doing, it comes pretty damned close.

I think Bill Maher said it best, "America needs to get laid." Since soniclover probably has no real solid information about sex outside of what he's been taught in this shithole of an education system we have in this country, I don't really hold his ignorance against him.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Porn doesn't simulate tactile contact (Yeah, you've got you hand, but it only goes so far, nothing like having another human body), or olfactory stimulation and it does a piss-poor job of audio-visual stimulation. Lacking in every way, I really don't see how anyone could argue that it is a viable substitute.

Then again, maybe they're more into visual stimulation than anything else.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

I think there's a way to scientifically measure a healthy sex life, though. I mean, whether or not you're active, being disease free and not allowing your drive (or lack thereof) interfere with normal social function/interaction seems like a pretty ideal definition.

Determining normalcy seems kind of like a moot point, anyway.

I was speaking idiomatically.