|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
The only problem I see here is that both passages are written in a retardedly heavy-handed style. Are you seriously suggesting that information like key, tempo, and chord progressions is "completely irrelevant" in an encyclopedia entry about a song?
Also, the whole point of fanboy hiveminds like Memory Alpha is that you get the obsessive types to do all the work for you just in case you do want to find some random bit of trivia for whatever reason. The more disturbingly comprehensive, the better, as long as it gets split out into separate pages. God bless the sperglords. EDIT: Okay, that Porthos link did give me a laugh: Spoiler:
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
I agree with the point about scope and that Wikipedia should be limited to a general overview, but I did say that splitting information into separate pages is important. An external link to a specialized wiki is not much different from a link to another page on Wikipedia itself.
What I don't get is the idea that you can have too much information, unless you're transitioning to a complaint about the environmental impact of server farms or something. It's not hard to think of a situation where you would to learn about a particular song, especially if the information helps you learn to play it. There's nowhere I can't reach. |