 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Wark!
 Member 1085 Level 3.62 Mar 2006 
|
hmm, tenseiken was faster but here is my answer (i would use foobar for resampling AND mp3 conversion):
I guess you mean samplerate in stead of bitrate. Changing the samplerate (resample) will lower the quality. But if you use a good convertor the quality drop can be very small and unnoticable. Personally i would convert them all to 48khz (or maybe 44.1khz) and then convert them to mp3 with lame -V2. Foobar2000 has a neat convert option that you can use for resampling and mp3 encoding. Jam it back in, in the dark. |
|
Wark!
Member 1085 Level 3.62 Mar 2006
|
btw i've read that the SRC (Secret Rabit Code) resampler should give a better quality than the standard foobar resampler. www.mega-nerd.com/SRC/fb2k.html
There's nowhere I can't reach. |
|
Wark!
Member 1085 Level 3.62 Mar 2006
|
The thing is that foobar comes with the PPHS resampler nowadays. I've never heard of that one...
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Slogra