|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
I disagree that the cost argument is ridiculous however. Yes the top end costs about the same, but that's not a 1:1 performance comparison. No matter how you do the math, the Athlon chips are better price/performance chips. The only area that Intel has a better price/performance ratio is with it's ultra low end Pentium D (805, 920), these are good value, but low power CPUs. Jam it back in, in the dark.
"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."
|
1 Keeping it cooler will increase it's lifespan.
2 If you have other hot components in your machine it can actually be a problem with the higher end CPUs, the heat from all the other components overheats the CPU, and the CPU overheats the other components. Especially big concern with systems that have high end Pentium 4s and fanless GPUs etc. It's just not a balanced system and can smoke your GPU. Or if you have really hot GPU(s) they can overheat your CPU. 3 Overclocking is often in the back of reviewer's minds if not expressly mentioned. When overclocking CPUs it's always a good idea to have tons of cooling. 4 Some produce less noise as well, this is a concern for some. There's nowhere I can't reach.
"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."
|
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."
|