Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85242 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Help Desk

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


Intel vs AMD Dual Core Chips
Reply
 
Thread Tools
PUG1911
I expected someone like you. What did you expect?


Member 2001

Level 17.98

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 2006, 03:26 PM #1 of 19
Originally Posted by Cless
You know, the cost argument in the Athlon 64 age is pretty fucking ridiculous. AMD's high-end chips cost just as much as Intel's. I'd say right now the situation looks more like:

AMD > Intel (on the desktop)
Intel > AMD (in the laptops)

And soon, with Conroe and Merom, Intel will be better on both fronts. Then AMD really will have to find a way to push prices down, because that'll be their only big selling point.
I'll mostly agree. Yes Intel's Core Duo is a better mobile chip. While AMD's chips are better at the same price point on the desktop than Intel's.

I disagree that the cost argument is ridiculous however. Yes the top end costs about the same, but that's not a 1:1 performance comparison. No matter how you do the math, the Athlon chips are better price/performance chips. The only area that Intel has a better price/performance ratio is with it's ultra low end Pentium D (805, 920), these are good value, but low power CPUs.

Jam it back in, in the dark.
"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."
PUG1911
I expected someone like you. What did you expect?


Member 2001

Level 17.98

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2006, 09:28 PM #2 of 19
1 Keeping it cooler will increase it's lifespan.

2 If you have other hot components in your machine it can actually be a problem with the higher end CPUs, the heat from all the other components overheats the CPU, and the CPU overheats the other components. Especially big concern with systems that have high end Pentium 4s and fanless GPUs etc. It's just not a balanced system and can smoke your GPU. Or if you have really hot GPU(s) they can overheat your CPU.

3 Overclocking is often in the back of reviewer's minds if not expressly mentioned. When overclocking CPUs it's always a good idea to have tons of cooling.

4 Some produce less noise as well, this is a concern for some.

There's nowhere I can't reach.
"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."
PUG1911
I expected someone like you. What did you expect?


Member 2001

Level 17.98

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2006, 01:49 AM #3 of 19
Originally Posted by Magic
When I was first building my computer I didn't even know CPU's came with fans.

When it comes to temperatures, how hot is too hot for a CPU? I don't really know how to gauge whether or not my fan is doing a decent job or not. I bought the Socket A version of one of these last year, but I had trouble installing it so I never got to find out if it was any better than what I've got now.
The safe temperatures a CPU can handle vary quite a lot by model. This .PDF has some information on what a Socket A CPU should run at http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/cont...docs/23794.pdf

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."
Reply

Thread Tools

Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Help Desk > Intel vs AMD Dual Core Chips

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.