![]() |
||
|
|
Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
EA Loses BOND License
I found this information on a Bond website:
Variety reports on Activision gain of James Bond videogame licence, news on EA James Bond has switched sides in the videogame world. In a major shift, MGM and Electronic Arts have ended their deal for the superspy, one of the most popular and profitable licenses in the vidgame bizbiz, four years before it was skedded to end - reports Variety. Lion has signed a new deal with game publisher Activision that extends through 2014 and is worth around $50 million, according to insiders. In other big videogame news prior to next week's E3 industry confabconfab, THQ has confirmed that it is developing a "Sopranos" game that will include the show's creative team and cast, while Warner Bros. and EA have delayed the "Superman Returns" game from the theatrical release date in June to the DVD release this fall -- a potentially costly move. EA first published a Bond game in 1998 and extended its deal with MGM and EON Prods. just three years ago through 2010. At the time Bond games were some of the industry's most successful. EA has published three since then; 2003's "Everything or Nothing" and 2005's "From Russia With Love" did moderately well, while 2004's "Goldeneye: Rogue Agents" sold poorly. Publisher was not able to make a game tie-in for the upcoming "Casino Royale" pic, however, costing MGM millions in license fees. Insiders indicated that decision, along with a shift in EA corporate strategy, led to the two canceling the deal. "No game means no revenue, and, for the first year, the consumer products team was left high and dry," said one person close to the deal. Game publisher has indicated a decision to limit its licensed games and focus on original intellectual property, though it has recently invested heavily in a few key Hollywood licenses such as "The Lord of the Rings" and "The Simpsons." Insiders said Activision was the No. 2 bidder for Bond in 2003, making it a natural to take the license now. "We looked at a very selective group of potential partners," noted MGM exec veepveep of consumer products Travis Rutherford. First Bond game from Activision is expected to be a tie-in to the film after "Casino Royale." Publisher has the rights to make Bond games not connected to new films, however. The 21 Bond videogames published since 1983 have sold some 30 million units overall. -------- Well, maybe this is a good move for the Bond francise. 'The World Is Not Enough' (N64 Version) and 'Everything or Nothing' are great. 'Nightfire' is good. 'From Russia With Love' and 'Agent Under Fire' are OK. 'Tomorrow Never Dies' and 'Goldeneye: Rogue Agent' are both bad. Hit and Miss with EA. Hopefully Activision will have a fresh new take on the games. xman25 Jam it back in, in the dark. |
Activision and Bond?
Oh wow, this game is going TU ROK!!! *sarcasm* Unless they can pull off something Rare, it seems bad for the secret agent future. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
The Bond games have been mediocre at best after Goldeneye. EA never could get it right, and I doubt Activision will either.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. ![]() |
Indeed... These days I'm comparing any Bond game to Perfect Dark 64 or Halo, and if it can outdo any one of those then it'll prove itself worthy of purchase.
EA's Bond games just didn't have the feeling of Goldeneye, PD or even Halo. I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
Hmmm.. looks like EA did us all a favor and droped the Bond franchise before they did something really bad with it. Not to bash on EA or anything but truth be told their games aren't really all that great.
I was speaking idiomatically. |
Hmm, after EA accuired Free Radical, I was actually kinda hoping that they would work their Time Splitters magic on the Bond. It couldn't be worse than Rogue Agent...
How ya doing, buddy? ![]() |
Shame nobody mentioned Everything or Nothing which is a rather splendid allround action-adventure with a good Bond story and nicely developed villains. It has elements of stealth, action, driving and exploring and sharp controls. Also the likenesses and voice talent all help to recreate that genuine Bond feeling, which IMO was executed in a better way than in the last two Bond movies (TWINE and DAD).
FELIPE NO |
What, you don't want my bikini-clad body? |
I gave up on Bond games a long time ago. I'd rather play a good game based on original IP.
Jam it back in, in the dark. ![]() |
I also enjoyed Everything or Nothing. It had a coop mode, which was fun.
Most amazing jew boots ![]() |
Yes! EA is out! Anything is better than EA. Rogue Agent is the worst game I've ever played.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. ![]() [ MOBIUS ] |
The last fun bond game I played was Goldeneye and Everything or Nothing.
All EA games seem to have this obvious sense of "You're only going where we ALLOW you to go", which is never present in other games of the same genre. I can't pinpoint WHAT it is, but I call it the EA Syndrome. Needless to say, I tried out nightfire and rouge agents, and it just seemed like they took what could have been great and shit all over it. I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? ![]() |
News about one less franchise license for EA is always good news.
I was speaking idiomatically. |
What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? ![]() |
So, it was good for a distraction, but even then we got bored after about a half-hour or somehting. Most amazing jew boots ![]() |
What, you don't want my bikini-clad body? ![]() |
Yay, finally. EA sucks.
Most amazing jew boots
"Don't mind if I do!"
|
Bout time, I couldn't really get into EA's bond games for some reason (esp. after playing Goldeneye on the N64 and Halo/Perfect Dark).
How ya doing, buddy? |
Larry Oji, Super Moderator, Judge, "Dirge for the Follin" Project Director, VG Frequency Creator |
EA just sucks ass period. They're never willing to try anything risky or new in their games -- all their games are always designed to "cater to the masses."
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
EA has made a total mockery of the Bond game franchise since it took over. Nightfire was the only game I could remotely get into. It'll be interesting to see how Activision fairs. If I had to give an opinion on that right now, I'd say not much better than EA. We'll see...
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
Anybody have an opinion on From Russia With Love, I saw it in the bargain bin and thought about picking it up.. I was speaking idiomatically. |
It's there for a reason. It's too short and too simple. If you take your time you'll have it beat in about 5 hours. Maybe even less than that. What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? ![]() |
I dont see why you guys praising EA's loss.
Acitivision ain't much better, you know. FELIPE NO |
I could care less about Activision. They could go and make a James Bond's Pro Skater for all I care. I'm just glad EA finally gave up. What, you don't want my bikini-clad body? ![]()
Last edited by Synthesis; May 14, 2006 at 09:41 PM.
Reason: Automerged additional post.
|