Nancy Grace

Occasionally I find myself flipping channels in bouts of boredom and often find myself coming across this lummox of a woman spewing forth a daily dosage of bile across my TV screen.

I actually sat and watched her one day and found myself wondering how it is that anyone can take this lady seriously.

There is nothing wrong at all with a very strong opinionated person, man or woman. But Nancy Grace comes across numerous times as being just plain bonkers. She also seems to have this little thing about nobody being innocent at all....EVER. And having read up on her even in cases where said person is innocent she still villifies them.

Am I the only one who wonders why so many people seem to like her and continually watch her show? She has absolutely no appeal to me whatsoever, but then again maybe I'm not the target audience for her CNN show or something. I don't get it.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

That bitch really gets to me, even though her husband got murdered and she's been a prosecutor for many years, but the way that she doesent know when to shut the fuck up and know her place in the world.

Most amazing jew boots

Well her whole shtick are victim's rights. I just think for her that means assuming guilty before proven innocent.

I can't stand her. She tries to parade herself as this enpowering strong woman with a voice but she doesn't realize that all she's doing is making herself look and sound like a loud-mouthed belligerent redneck who just happens to have a law degree.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Stick to MSNBC. Hardball is core politics. Rita is core domestic stories. Countdown is pure news with humor.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Well the real CNN is great, of course MSNBC does have its shows. Had to delete the CNN she is on because I don’t want to hear her; she and Bill- arrogant white people who are given a pulpit.

I was speaking idiomatically.

MAN. I was totally going to write an email to the people who put her on back about 8 months ago. I stumbled across her show, and I LITERALLY wanted to climb into the TV and ring her motherfucking neck.

I hate her more than almost anyone on news television - INCLUDING Bill O'Reilly. At least he's funny to watch, you know?

But this woman. She makes my skin crawl - much like Dr. Laura Schlessinger. There's another one I wish would be taken out behind the chemical shed and have "silenced."

I do, however, have a horrible thing with obnoxious, annoying women.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

This woman is quite unpleasant to watch. She doesn't anger me as much as Bill O'reilly (he needs to fucking shut up), but she's not too far off. Her face is an eyesore and her voice makes me wanna drill my ears out. Worst of all, as stated above, she just keeps on spilling vocal shit all over the place whenever she has something to say.

Didn't she work for Faux-News? If so, that explains a lot. She needs a hate site. Just like Bill O'reilly has sweetjesusihatebilloreilly.com.

Speaking of Bill, I'm surprised that I haven't stumbeled across some sort of an online flash titled, Kill Bill O'reilly, where perhaps Uma could just beat the shit outta him with her katana.

FELIPE NO

Woman fucking pisses me off. I remember back when the Scott Peterson shit case closed and he was found guilty, she was on some Court TV show and was just going insane.

"How do you like that decision?" and when someone would say something she'd go all fucking out and be like "Sounds like sour grapes to me. How do those sour grapes taste" and so on and so forth. I mean fuck a damn duck. Some people just don't need to be on TV and heard, plain and simple. If she likes to act like a retard, they need to put her on Fox News.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

She doesn't bother me very much. In a lot of those cases she so adamantly voices her stance, she is usually correct. She is a very outspoken, pro-prosecutor. I think her stance on victim's rights is at least a stance on something solid. There are just too many tentative prosecutors out there.

Originally Posted by kat

I just think for her that means assuming guilty before proven innocent.

That's technically what being a prosecutor means. Why would they bother to make a case unless they believed that person was guilty of a said crime?

It's the defendants lawyers that say, "Innocent until proven guilty"

Most amazing jew boots

Originally Posted by Synthesis

That's technically what being a prosecutor means. Why would they bother to make a case unless they believed that person was guilty of a said crime?

It's the defendants lawyers that say, "Innocent until proven guilty"

She advocates the notion that it's a jury's responsibility to convict. Something that happens quite a lot, as people are predisposed to thinking the worse of people, and their love of revenge. And you are here lending your support to the 'convict regardless of guilt' mentality.

Can't say I agree with that.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by Synthesis

That's technically what being a prosecutor means. Why would they bother to make a case unless they believed that person was guilty of a said crime?

It's the defendants lawyers that say, "Innocent until proven guilty"

Problem is: when she's on TV she's not acting as prosecutor, but a journalist. SHe bugs me as well. Declaring people guilty before they have been indicted or in some cases, before they're even considered a suspect. Lord knows how much damage she does to jury pools. But what irritates me most, is she has no interest in discovery. SHe makes up her mind and never wants to hear a dissenting opinion. With fuck-wits like her in the prosecutors office, no wonder they are finding so many innocent people behind bars.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Originally Posted by Gordon_Freeman

Problem is: when she's on TV she's not acting as prosecutor, but a journalist. SHe bugs me as well. Declaring people guilty before they have been indicted or in some cases, before they're even considered a suspect. Lord knows how much damage she does to jury pools. But what irritates me most, is she has no interest in discovery. SHe makes up her mind and never wants to hear a dissenting opinion. With fuck-wits like her in the prosecutors office, no wonder they are finding so many innocent people behind bars.

You don't understand man. What you need to do is lock somebody up. Anybody will do, but it's most effective if it's some with that look, y'know. That way everyone feels better and society continues as though nothing happened. We need blood, lots of blood, and it matters not the source.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Originally Posted by Synthesis

It's the defendants lawyers that say, "Innocent until proven guilty"

Noooo, thats not exactly exclusive to only defense lawyers, sir.

"The presumption of innocence" that a person is "innocent until proven guilty" is the Golden Thread that runs through (criminal) law. It was what is known as "common law" and although it has appeared in statutes (Acts and suchlike) and been varied from time to time, it is part of what people would consider "natural justice.'

The criminal burden of proof is not that a person is guilty just because it is "more likely than not" that they did something, but if there is any "reasonable doubt" about guilt, then that person is entitled to be acquitted. That is the "burden of proof" in criminal trials and it rests upon the precept that a person is only "guilty" after a fair trial - or as you may say "due process of law."

I was speaking idiomatically.